William Sullivan, Attorney at Law
  • Home
  • Services
    • Medical Contract Review
    • Medical Licensing Board Representation
    • Medical Legal Educational Services
    • Medical Case Review
  • EMTALA
  • Medical Legal Web Links
  • Blog
  • About Me
Coronavirus

Do Patients Require Routine Coronavirus Testing?

by W Sullivan March 17, 2020
343

Probably not.

State or federal laws may change in the future, but currently many patients are being denied routine coronavirus testing by state health departments. This March 12 article in Yahoo News showed that the CDC tested only 77 people in the week beginning March 8, 2020 and the CDC’s Stephen Redd, MD stated that coronavirus “is not a problem we can test our way out of.” One of the big problems with coronavirus testing is that there is currently an insufficient number of tests available. Until there is greater availability of tests, coronavirus testing is probably going to be limited to higher risk patients.

There is no cure for coronavirus, and currently the only treatment available for coronavirus patients involves supportive care (and isolation). At this point, coronavirus testing is performed to trend cases and to arrange for quarantine or isolation of infected patients and their contacts. Results for testing done through the CDC have a turnaround time of 2-7 days. The Cleveland Clinic recently developed a coronavirus test with a turnaround time of 8 hours. However, due to a delay in turnaround times, coronavirus testing will not affect a patient’s immediate care.

In the emergency department, EMTALA requires a screening exam to evaluate for an emergency medical condition and then to provide stabilizing treatment if an emergency medical condition is found. The presence or absence of COVID-19 does not, by itself, differentiate between a stable and unstable patient. Similarly, a diagnosis of strep pneumonia versus influenza pneumonia does not differentiate between a stable and unstable patient – the differentiation only matters for treatment purposes. Stability in a patient with a respiratory illness is almost always a clinical determination. With regard to coronavirus, recall news reports showing many relatively asymptomatic people quarantined on cruise ships and infected with coronavirus.

Consider the issue in a different way: If a patient with minor upper respiratory symptoms would not require additional testing before the discovery of coronavirus, why would a patient with the same minor symptoms require testing now?

When considering whether EMTALA may apply to requests for routine coronavirus testing, also consider that patients who come to the emergency department solely to request routine testing probably do not trigger an EMTALA screening examination requirement. The plain language of 42 U.S.C. §1395dd(a) states

In the case of a hospital that has a hospital emergency department, if any individual (whether or not eligible for benefits under this subchapter) comes to the emergency department and a request is made on the individual’s behalf for examination or treatment for a medical condition, the hospital must provide for an appropriate medical screening examination within the capability of the hospital’s emergency department, including ancillary services routinely available to the emergency department, to determine whether or not an emergency medical condition (within the meaning of subsection (e)(1)) exists. 

I wasn’t able to find any legal precedent stating that a request solely for lab testing constituted a request for examination or treatment and therefore treated a screening exam requirement under EMTALA statutes.

If an individual comes to an emergency department asking only to be tested for coronavirus, a reasonable response might be that “We don’t perform (routine) coronavirus testing (on premises). Would you like to be evaluated by a physician?” If a patient wishes to be evaluated for a cough, fever, or other symptom, then they would be registered and placed in the triage queue.

The Bottom Line With Patients Who Request Routine Coronavirus Testing

Stable patients who are concerned that they may have coronavirus can always contact their state health department to inquire about testing. Patients can also be referred to the CDC website at www.cdc.gov/covid19. However, in most cases, whether or not testing is performed, stable patients who think they have coronavirus should probably be advised to self-quarantine for the recommended 14 day observation period or until they have been symptom-free for three days. If their symptoms worsen, they should be instructed to seek further medical care.

0 comments 0 FacebookTwitterPinterestThreadsBlueskyEmail

You may also like

Illinois Medical Board Denies FOIA Request for COVID Docs

April 16, 2022

Important COVID-Related Legal Opinions

January 25, 2021

COVID And Immunity From Liability Under The Federal PREP Act

March 31, 2020

How OSHA Protects Worker’s Rights In The COVID Pandemic

March 27, 2020

Post Infection Procedural Issues for Coronavirus Patients

March 25, 2020

Can Coronavirus Patients Use Ibuprofen?

March 20, 2020

Coronavirus Discharge Instructions

March 18, 2020

Salt Water Doesn’t Kill Coronavirus

March 18, 2020

What’s the Difference Between Quarantine, Isolation, and “Shelter in Place”?

March 18, 2020

Hackers are Using COVID-19 to Scam Hospitals and Healthcare Providers

March 18, 2020

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

nineteen + 2 =

Looking for Something Else?

Thoughtful Remarks

  • http://7%20Negative%20Results%20of%20Careless%20Credentialing%20-%20A5%20Credentialing
    7 Negative Results of Careless Credentialing - A5 Credentialing

    […] who create untrue NPDB reports…

  • http://W%20Sullivan
    W Sullivan

    Part of the answer to your…

  • http://JoBeth
    JoBeth

    I work for a hospital system…

  • http://W%20Sullivan
    W Sullivan

    A better way to look at…

  • http://NASABrewr
    NASABrewr

    Does anyone have insight into the…

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Does Mutual Indemnification Make Employment Contracts Safer?

  • 2

    Denver Hospital Offering Emergency Physicians $21 Per Hour

  • 3

    Indemnification in Medical Contracts

  • 4

    Persistent Healthcare Worker Shortage Despite Increased Job Growth

  • 5

    How to Mitigate Job Loss Due to Coronavirus

Post Categories

Client Questions (4) Contracts (22) Coronavirus (12) Creative Writing (3) Educational (3) Legal Cases (28) Medical Boards (7) Medical Malpractice (2) Medicolegal (18) Policy (5) Random Thoughts (4)

Post Topics

Criminal Acts (1) Documentation (3) Due Process (6) EMTALA (2) Healthcare Quality Improvement Act (2) Indemnification (7) Informed Consent (1) Insurance (5) Legal Documents (2) Locum Tenens (1) Medical License (3) Megaverdicts (4) Midlevel Providers (2) National Practitioner Databank (4) Patient Discharge (1) Surgery (3)

Terms of use/privacy policy

As a condition of entering this web site you agree that you will NOT to use the information contained on this site as medical advice or as legal advice and that all information on this site is for informational purposes only. You agree that any information you post on this site may be used or republished without further attribution or compensation. You also acknowledge and agree to the terms of the privacy policy.

William Sullivan, Attorney at Law
  • Home
  • Services
    • Medical Contract Review
    • Medical Licensing Board Representation
    • Medical Legal Educational Services
    • Medical Case Review
  • EMTALA
  • Medical Legal Web Links
  • Blog
  • About Me